<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GEEK MADNESS: Geek 16, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/</link>
	<description>Original Comedy Music from Professional Singing Persons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:22:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: datn</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26923</link>
		<dc:creator>datn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26923</guid>
		<description>That John Hodgman is beating TMBG, Simon Pegg is beating Randall Munroe and ANYBODY is beating Douglas Adams has me worried about the future of humankind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That John Hodgman is beating TMBG, Simon Pegg is beating Randall Munroe and ANYBODY is beating Douglas Adams has me worried about the future of humankind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PonderousMan</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26911</link>
		<dc:creator>PonderousMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26911</guid>
		<description>@Mark, Molly - I take it that Mark&#039;s apology was accepted?  *grin*

@Zoe- this is always the challenge for democracy - it&#039;s not always who is eligible to vote that matters, but who actually casts the vote.  I expect that this contest has created more than a few &quot;GOTV&quot; efforts by readers looking to swing things one way or another...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark, Molly &#8211; I take it that Mark&#8217;s apology was accepted?  *grin*</p>
<p>@Zoe- this is always the challenge for democracy &#8211; it&#8217;s not always who is eligible to vote that matters, but who actually casts the vote.  I expect that this contest has created more than a few &#8220;GOTV&#8221; efforts by readers looking to swing things one way or another&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PonderousMan</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26910</link>
		<dc:creator>PonderousMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26910</guid>
		<description>On reflection, I sort of like the idea that we live people can vote for dead candidates - rather than the Chicago way, where the dead get to vote for live candidates. (Unless you consider the robot/clone factor -Richie Daley, anyone?)

However, if that&#039;s true,then the original brackets were likely missing some true founders of geekdom - Jules Verne, Isaac Asimov, and Benjamin Franklin, just for starters.

(If anyone doubts Franklin was a geek, compare his life to Jobs or one of the Googleboys... he was just too early for actually *using* electricity to do things, but he helped get it all started.)

Which brings up an interesting idea - if reincarnation is true, then who would be the reincarnation of Verne, Franklin, or, lesse.... Orson Welles, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On reflection, I sort of like the idea that we live people can vote for dead candidates &#8211; rather than the Chicago way, where the dead get to vote for live candidates. (Unless you consider the robot/clone factor -Richie Daley, anyone?)</p>
<p>However, if that&#8217;s true,then the original brackets were likely missing some true founders of geekdom &#8211; Jules Verne, Isaac Asimov, and Benjamin Franklin, just for starters.</p>
<p>(If anyone doubts Franklin was a geek, compare his life to Jobs or one of the Googleboys&#8230; he was just too early for actually *using* electricity to do things, but he helped get it all started.)</p>
<p>Which brings up an interesting idea &#8211; if reincarnation is true, then who would be the reincarnation of Verne, Franklin, or, lesse&#8230;. Orson Welles, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoe</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26895</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26895</guid>
		<description>TMBG can&#039;t lose. This isn&#039;t right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TMBG can&#8217;t lose. This isn&#8217;t right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffy</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26892</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 07:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26892</guid>
		<description>Randall is a better geek (Simon Pegg has never worked for NASA) and is actually funny. I laugh at xkcd all the time (or at least enjoy the ones not meant to be funny) whereas this Simon Pegg character isn&#039;t geeky enough, and doesn&#039;t have the funny thing down, so therefore, 

Randall Munroe &gt; Simon Pegg

QED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randall is a better geek (Simon Pegg has never worked for NASA) and is actually funny. I laugh at xkcd all the time (or at least enjoy the ones not meant to be funny) whereas this Simon Pegg character isn&#8217;t geeky enough, and doesn&#8217;t have the funny thing down, so therefore, </p>
<p>Randall Munroe &gt; Simon Pegg</p>
<p>QED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelastic</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26891</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelastic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26891</guid>
		<description>Oh, are we supposed to be pretending to take this seriously? 

I&#039;d really have to know more about what the position entailed and how much time it would take away from the activities we like them for. I guess Tom Lehrer would be a good choice since he hasn&#039;t performed much recently anyway, and claims to have voted for Obama. But I don&#039;t think it&#039;d be nice of us to make him work in politics. 

There&#039;s nobody in this round that I think would be suitable in a pretending-to-take-this-seriously way. Either I&#039;ve never heard of them, I don&#039;t think they&#039;re geeky, or I&#039;d prefer them to continue what they&#039;re doing. Well, maybe Hodgman would do, since I haven&#039;t actually read his books, and he doesn&#039;t do Coultonised booksignings anywhere near me, so I probably wouldn&#039;t miss him that much during his term. I wouldn&#039;t miss TMBG either, but I don&#039;t really think they&#039;re geeky. Though electing two people to the position might be an advantage, but that seems unusual for politics. In fact, The Wanderer, why don&#039;t you refuse to vote for candidates which consist of more than one person? I doubt a duo could serve in any single cabinet position, or whatever these positions are called in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, are we supposed to be pretending to take this seriously? </p>
<p>I&#8217;d really have to know more about what the position entailed and how much time it would take away from the activities we like them for. I guess Tom Lehrer would be a good choice since he hasn&#8217;t performed much recently anyway, and claims to have voted for Obama. But I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;d be nice of us to make him work in politics. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s nobody in this round that I think would be suitable in a pretending-to-take-this-seriously way. Either I&#8217;ve never heard of them, I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re geeky, or I&#8217;d prefer them to continue what they&#8217;re doing. Well, maybe Hodgman would do, since I haven&#8217;t actually read his books, and he doesn&#8217;t do Coultonised booksignings anywhere near me, so I probably wouldn&#8217;t miss him that much during his term. I wouldn&#8217;t miss TMBG either, but I don&#8217;t really think they&#8217;re geeky. Though electing two people to the position might be an advantage, but that seems unusual for politics. In fact, The Wanderer, why don&#8217;t you refuse to vote for candidates which consist of more than one person? I doubt a duo could serve in any single cabinet position, or whatever these positions are called in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wanderer</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26889</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26889</guid>
		<description>Oh, I do have an idea of just how much of &quot;geek culture&quot; (as you put it) wouldn&#039;t exist without Adams. I just don&#039;t think that that factor is nearly enough to outweigh the fact that he would be unable to serve in the position.

No fictional or dead people should ever have been included in the list of candidates in the first place, unless there is some way to arrange for them to be able to serve if chosen; the fact that any were included means that no one is even pretending to take this seriously. I think it&#039;s interesting enough to take part in anyway, but at least one of my brothers (who happens to be arguably significantly geekier than I am) is refusing to even look at the site because of that flaw.

(For the record, I much prefer Hitchhiker&#039;s to Penny Arcade - I don&#039;t even read the latter, and haven&#039;t been greatly impressed by what I&#039;ve seen over other people&#039;s shoulders. It&#039;s just that living, potentially-real people get an automatic pass when up against dead or definitely-fictional people - that also being a major part of the reason I voted for Jobs.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I do have an idea of just how much of &#8220;geek culture&#8221; (as you put it) wouldn&#8217;t exist without Adams. I just don&#8217;t think that that factor is nearly enough to outweigh the fact that he would be unable to serve in the position.</p>
<p>No fictional or dead people should ever have been included in the list of candidates in the first place, unless there is some way to arrange for them to be able to serve if chosen; the fact that any were included means that no one is even pretending to take this seriously. I think it&#8217;s interesting enough to take part in anyway, but at least one of my brothers (who happens to be arguably significantly geekier than I am) is refusing to even look at the site because of that flaw.</p>
<p>(For the record, I much prefer Hitchhiker&#8217;s to Penny Arcade &#8211; I don&#8217;t even read the latter, and haven&#8217;t been greatly impressed by what I&#8217;ve seen over other people&#8217;s shoulders. It&#8217;s just that living, potentially-real people get an automatic pass when up against dead or definitely-fictional people &#8211; that also being a major part of the reason I voted for Jobs.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: three08</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26883</link>
		<dc:creator>three08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26883</guid>
		<description>i weep for a world that puts penny arcade ahead of the hitchhiker&#039;s guide to the galaxy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i weep for a world that puts penny arcade ahead of the hitchhiker&#8217;s guide to the galaxy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Pritchard</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26878</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Pritchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26878</guid>
		<description>WT fuck is going on this week?!?
Simon Pegg is awesome and funny but there is no way in this or any other universe that he should beat Randall to the title of Secretary of Geek Affairs!! 

Kaylee is the right choice for the second one, although I suspect a lot of people are voting with their penis (how very dexterous).

Match 3 I don&#039;t really think matters because either should lose in the next round.

and Finally Douglas Adams... Again I love Gabe and Tycho but I think even they would have to admit that even in non-corporeal form Douglas would be a shoo-in. If you voted against him you probably don&#039;t even realise how much of geek-culture just wouldn&#039;t exist without him. As for the guy who said he is a Genus, that may have been a typo, but it&#039;s probably still true. He was a breed all his own and sorely missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WT fuck is going on this week?!?<br />
Simon Pegg is awesome and funny but there is no way in this or any other universe that he should beat Randall to the title of Secretary of Geek Affairs!! </p>
<p>Kaylee is the right choice for the second one, although I suspect a lot of people are voting with their penis (how very dexterous).</p>
<p>Match 3 I don&#8217;t really think matters because either should lose in the next round.</p>
<p>and Finally Douglas Adams&#8230; Again I love Gabe and Tycho but I think even they would have to admit that even in non-corporeal form Douglas would be a shoo-in. If you voted against him you probably don&#8217;t even realise how much of geek-culture just wouldn&#8217;t exist without him. As for the guy who said he is a Genus, that may have been a typo, but it&#8217;s probably still true. He was a breed all his own and sorely missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelastic</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26867</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelastic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26867</guid>
		<description>Douglas Adams is a genus?

Man, I wish I were a &lt;i&gt;Douglasadams sapiens&lt;/i&gt;. Yes, Man, I&#039;m talking to you.

(Now trying to figure out what the tune is that I&#039;m singing &#039;Oh, I wish I were a Douglasadams sapiens&#039; to in my head. Argh, I think it&#039;s the Oscar Mayer wiener song. And I&#039;ve never even heard that except from imitations in movies.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douglas Adams is a genus?</p>
<p>Man, I wish I were a <i>Douglasadams sapiens</i>. Yes, Man, I&#8217;m talking to you.</p>
<p>(Now trying to figure out what the tune is that I&#8217;m singing &#8216;Oh, I wish I were a Douglasadams sapiens&#8217; to in my head. Argh, I think it&#8217;s the Oscar Mayer wiener song. And I&#8217;ve never even heard that except from imitations in movies.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SirToasty</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26865</link>
		<dc:creator>SirToasty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26865</guid>
		<description>If you voted for Randall, go to Youtube and look up 50,000 Zombies with Simon Pegg and Nick Frost and then hang your head in shame for the terrible thing you have done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you voted for Randall, go to Youtube and look up 50,000 Zombies with Simon Pegg and Nick Frost and then hang your head in shame for the terrible thing you have done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slammu</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26862</link>
		<dc:creator>Slammu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26862</guid>
		<description>Everyone who voted for the XKCD guy is a bad person and should feel bad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone who voted for the XKCD guy is a bad person and should feel bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.Funk</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26860</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Funk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26860</guid>
		<description>Stop saying dumb things Tzeentch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop saying dumb things Tzeentch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26851</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26851</guid>
		<description>xkcd is awful, what is wrong with you people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xkcd is awful, what is wrong with you people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tzeentch</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26836</link>
		<dc:creator>Tzeentch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26836</guid>
		<description>everyone who voted against Douglas Adams is RETARDED
penny arcade is stupid, Douglas Adams is a genus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>everyone who voted against Douglas Adams is RETARDED<br />
penny arcade is stupid, Douglas Adams is a genus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffy</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26835</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26835</guid>
		<description>Randall Munroe is the incarnation of all that is right with the world. I do not see why he is not the unanimous choice. 
Steve Jobs is awesome in my eyes, so he had my vote, but unlike Randall, I can see reasons why people might dislike him, so I&#039;m less frustrated that he is losing.
Hodgman of course. No contest at all. That list of hobo names was long, but worthwhile.
The first three were easy choices. The last was incredibly tough. I&#039;ve known Gabe and Tycho longer (though I own the exact same number of books from both options, five)and I check Penny Arcade whenever it is up, so they win my vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randall Munroe is the incarnation of all that is right with the world. I do not see why he is not the unanimous choice.<br />
Steve Jobs is awesome in my eyes, so he had my vote, but unlike Randall, I can see reasons why people might dislike him, so I&#8217;m less frustrated that he is losing.<br />
Hodgman of course. No contest at all. That list of hobo names was long, but worthwhile.<br />
The first three were easy choices. The last was incredibly tough. I&#8217;ve known Gabe and Tycho longer (though I own the exact same number of books from both options, five)and I check Penny Arcade whenever it is up, so they win my vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-26831</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26831</guid>
		<description>Sweet Tinkerbell Jeebus, that was hard!  I love them all.  How could you make me choose?  (You magnificent bastards.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet Tinkerbell Jeebus, that was hard!  I love them all.  How could you make me choose?  (You magnificent bastards.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleenky</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-26807</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleenky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26807</guid>
		<description>(Geek Madness is fun and all, but I&#039;m jonesing for a new podcast ep.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Geek Madness is fun and all, but I&#8217;m jonesing for a new podcast ep.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wanderer</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-26801</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26801</guid>
		<description>1. Randall Munroe. Simon Pegg&#039;s movies may be funny, but xkcd is brilliant - not necessarily funny, but clever, intelligent, and geeky as all hell - and sense of humor alone is not nearly enough to qualify someone to serve. (Not that Pegg necessarily doesn&#039;t have more, but he cannot outmatch Munroe.)

2. Steve Jobs. I&#039;m not very fond of him - if nothing else, he&#039;s a businessman, not a geek - but Kaylee is fictional, and so can&#039;t serve unless someone&#039;s finally achieved transfictional travel, and so isn&#039;t qualified to be a candidate in the first place. (Not to mention that she&#039;d be so far out of tune with our time and culture that her qualifications would be in question in any case.)

3. TMBG. This one wasn&#039;t an easy decision, not because either side is all that great (though both are quite good), but because neither is obviously better than the other. I just happen not to have seen much of Hodgman aside from the Mac/PC commercials, whereas I like TMBG quite a bit, and haven&#039;t heard nearly as many bad things about them as about him.

4. Gabe and Tycho. They might be fictional and so disqualified the same way as Kaylee, but they also might not (we really need a ruling on that), and Adams is dead and so couldn&#039;t serve unless someone&#039;s managed to reach beyond the grave and so isn&#039;t qualified to be a candidate in the first place. He&#039;s a great and glorious figure, and definitely geeky enough and legendary enough to qualify, and I&#039;d vote for him here in a heartbeat if he were still alive - but he isn&#039;t, so he&#039;s not an option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Randall Munroe. Simon Pegg&#8217;s movies may be funny, but xkcd is brilliant &#8211; not necessarily funny, but clever, intelligent, and geeky as all hell &#8211; and sense of humor alone is not nearly enough to qualify someone to serve. (Not that Pegg necessarily doesn&#8217;t have more, but he cannot outmatch Munroe.)</p>
<p>2. Steve Jobs. I&#8217;m not very fond of him &#8211; if nothing else, he&#8217;s a businessman, not a geek &#8211; but Kaylee is fictional, and so can&#8217;t serve unless someone&#8217;s finally achieved transfictional travel, and so isn&#8217;t qualified to be a candidate in the first place. (Not to mention that she&#8217;d be so far out of tune with our time and culture that her qualifications would be in question in any case.)</p>
<p>3. TMBG. This one wasn&#8217;t an easy decision, not because either side is all that great (though both are quite good), but because neither is obviously better than the other. I just happen not to have seen much of Hodgman aside from the Mac/PC commercials, whereas I like TMBG quite a bit, and haven&#8217;t heard nearly as many bad things about them as about him.</p>
<p>4. Gabe and Tycho. They might be fictional and so disqualified the same way as Kaylee, but they also might not (we really need a ruling on that), and Adams is dead and so couldn&#8217;t serve unless someone&#8217;s managed to reach beyond the grave and so isn&#8217;t qualified to be a candidate in the first place. He&#8217;s a great and glorious figure, and definitely geeky enough and legendary enough to qualify, and I&#8217;d vote for him here in a heartbeat if he were still alive &#8211; but he isn&#8217;t, so he&#8217;s not an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SemiEvolvedSimian</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-26795</link>
		<dc:creator>SemiEvolvedSimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26795</guid>
		<description>Mark, you FAIL.  FAIL FAIL FAIL.

1. The toughest choice of this round.  RM wins by a hair only because he gives us geekery three times a week.

2. Kaylee because I&#039;m not a Mac fanboi and I prefer &quot;cute&quot; over &quot;marketing shill&quot; any day.

3. TMBG by a mile.  Hodgman is a bit... manufactured, while TMBG earned their stripes over 20 years.  And in another 20 years, it&#039;s TMBG&#039;s music I&#039;ll be listening to... not Hodgman&#039;s commercials (harsh, yes, but it&#039;s important to consider the long view in this competition).

4. Adams by a parsec. I dig Gabe and Tycho, but they have not and probably will never open the eyes and minds of young adults the way Adams&#039; books did for so many of my generation.  Hats do go off to all three gentlemen for their extensive charity work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, you FAIL.  FAIL FAIL FAIL.</p>
<p>1. The toughest choice of this round.  RM wins by a hair only because he gives us geekery three times a week.</p>
<p>2. Kaylee because I&#8217;m not a Mac fanboi and I prefer &#8220;cute&#8221; over &#8220;marketing shill&#8221; any day.</p>
<p>3. TMBG by a mile.  Hodgman is a bit&#8230; manufactured, while TMBG earned their stripes over 20 years.  And in another 20 years, it&#8217;s TMBG&#8217;s music I&#8217;ll be listening to&#8230; not Hodgman&#8217;s commercials (harsh, yes, but it&#8217;s important to consider the long view in this competition).</p>
<p>4. Adams by a parsec. I dig Gabe and Tycho, but they have not and probably will never open the eyes and minds of young adults the way Adams&#8217; books did for so many of my generation.  Hats do go off to all three gentlemen for their extensive charity work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-26792</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26792</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry.  Woz and Whedon are in other brackets!  My bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry.  Woz and Whedon are in other brackets!  My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-26791</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26791</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see why Kaylee Frye is in the brackets and not Joss Whedon.  Except that it raises the estrogen levels of a very male dominated competition.

I don&#039;t see how Steve Jobs could be losing to the fictional Frye.  I also don&#039;t see why Steve Wozniak was overlooked.  Although to be fair, the Wizard of Woz didn&#039;t have the &quot;Dancing With the Stars&quot; credit in his resume when this competition began.

I agree with Molly, TMBG should beat out Hodgeman, but I doubt that they will.  Not unless someone makes some amazingly persuasive Tweets to the TMBG fans.  I think that whoever wins the Hodgeman/TMBG contest has the best chance of taking down this WHOLE thing!  I just don&#039;t think there&#039;s anybody else on the board with their combination of Geek Street Cred and rabid fan base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see why Kaylee Frye is in the brackets and not Joss Whedon.  Except that it raises the estrogen levels of a very male dominated competition.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how Steve Jobs could be losing to the fictional Frye.  I also don&#8217;t see why Steve Wozniak was overlooked.  Although to be fair, the Wizard of Woz didn&#8217;t have the &#8220;Dancing With the Stars&#8221; credit in his resume when this competition began.</p>
<p>I agree with Molly, TMBG should beat out Hodgeman, but I doubt that they will.  Not unless someone makes some amazingly persuasive Tweets to the TMBG fans.  I think that whoever wins the Hodgeman/TMBG contest has the best chance of taking down this WHOLE thing!  I just don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anybody else on the board with their combination of Geek Street Cred and rabid fan base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-26790</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26790</guid>
		<description>OK, So this round was quite difficult, but nothing compared to JoCo vs. Joss Whedon.  Seriously . . . . my brain may explode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, So this round was quite difficult, but nothing compared to JoCo vs. Joss Whedon.  Seriously . . . . my brain may explode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-26789</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26789</guid>
		<description>It deserves to be mentioned that Kaylee isn&#039;t a geek, she&#039;s a grease monkey, and those things don&#039;t really overlap at all.

That being said, if you want someone cute and sexy to be minister of geek affairs, vote for her!  You&#039;re not going to find anything better on the geek ticket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It deserves to be mentioned that Kaylee isn&#8217;t a geek, she&#8217;s a grease monkey, and those things don&#8217;t really overlap at all.</p>
<p>That being said, if you want someone cute and sexy to be minister of geek affairs, vote for her!  You&#8217;re not going to find anything better on the geek ticket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centipede Damascus</title>
		<link>http://www.paulandstorm.com/archives/geek-madness-geek-16-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-26788</link>
		<dc:creator>Centipede Damascus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulandstorm.com/?p=767#comment-26788</guid>
		<description>Anyone who voted against Simon Pegg is a Communist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who voted against Simon Pegg is a Communist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

